Creativity building upon previous creativity. Inspiration. Mashup. Collaboration.
Sound familiar ? Reminds of of the current ecosystem for the internet.
(found this video on We Love Viral )
Contexutal Collaboration, Dissection & Discussion
The folks in my twitter feed are all about spreading the link love . As I continue to look for more people to add to my feed, I search for folks on twitter who are not only involved to a degree in the high-tech industry, but folks who shared interesting blog posts, articles, studies, reports, etc in their twitter stream.
Twitter is my passive way to come across new, interesting and not always relevant content. I cant emphasize how much I have learned from articles and blog posts that I have read that were all shared through link love. 
Yet what I noticed recently is that a lot of folks have started importing multiple blog feeds (not their blogs) into their twitter account and publish it using an automated platform.
I am not sure if the reason behind the RSS import into twitter is to really share with their readers new and interesting content, “show off” that they know whats going on or maybe its just a way for them to raise their profiles on sites that rank twitter status and influence. At least publish links to random & obscure blogs and not from the blogs that everyone and their mother reads on a daily basis.
This kind of behavior really aggravates me- I started following this person because I was truly interested in what they were tweeting about before they started importing blog feeds into their twitter stream. Now my stream is filled with their imported RSS stream.
But at the end of the day I am looking for new and interesting content, not the “same old” and what I really want, is *your* take on why you are sharing this link with me. I follow the folks in my feed for a reason – and its not to hear more regurgitation but to hear personal insight. Share the personal insight – I crave the personal insight.
Bring on the link love and leave behind the automated RSS in the twitter stream.
![]()
Growing up I read Newsday on a daily basis (might have something to do with Dear Abby and the comic section) and the New York Times over the weekend.
After moving abroad 5+ years ago, I still like to keep track of whats going on in my hometown and State. My parents still live there and Long Island holds a special place in my heart. I regularly open up Newsday’s website to keep up with the local news but have been quite dissapointed with both the quality of the articles and espeically the redesign of the site. In my opinion it is the complete opposite of a user friendly site.
But that will all change come Wednesday.
As of Wednesday, Newsday is changing its model from a fremium (free content) to a premium (pay for content) site. I am astounded that Cablevision (the parent owner of Newsday and Optimum Online) came to the conclusion that their content was worth a monthly fee. I am more astounded at their “package deal” -Optimum Online customers have free access to the online news site.
Newsday does not provide me with articles or news I cant find anywhere else (for free). It is a site I use out of nostalgia and I know I am one out of numerous folks who read Newsday online for nostalgic reasons.
According to an article in Newsday about the upcoming changed, advertising revenue are down and this is a solution to combat the declining profits. John Morton, head of the Morton Research Inc., a Silver Spring, Md.-based media consulting firm, was quoted as saying “the current model of free online content is not a “rational model.” and “Despite the false premise that has been floating around for the last 19 years, that information on the Internet wants to be free, [it] is just not true,” Morton said. “People have always been willing to pay for information they have felt was useful to them.”
The inherit argument John is making is flawed. In this day and age – unless you are providing your readers with content that cannot be found elsewhere readers are not going to pay for it. It is that simple. Wall Street Journal has a premium service for specific articles that are only found on their site and no where else which is why readers are willing to pay for it. I can easily open up the New York Post or The Long Island Press and read free content.
It is a shame that the newspaper and its owners cannot think outside the box to find new verticals to generate revenue and I have a few ideas (the first starting with a redesign of the site) .
Turning a freemium site into a premium site for content easily available elsewhere will kill the site. And as an avid reader of Newsday for almost 24 years, I would be sad to see that happen.
(oh and ps.. I couldnt find a link to a website for Morton Research Inc and yet they are a media consulting firm which makes me wonder doubt how a business can talk about the internet and not have a corporate website. )

I remember years ago when the only way to connect to the internet was by dial-up and how i would hit “redial” over and over again, each time with a bit more force hoping that my emphatic press of the enter button would be felt by someone (as if there was a little leprechaun on the other side of the line) and connect me to the internet over the rest of the users trying to dial in.
The mobile industry and innovation within the mobile market in the States has exploded and yet the infrastructure has yet to catch up with the needs of mobile users. Innovation within this space is like a superfast locomotive traveling on train tracks from the 1800’s. I wonder if the mobile carriers focus more of their attention on how to generate new revenue streams rather than focus on expanding their infrastructure to keep up with the ever growing needs of their current and potential customers.
Different US metropolitan cities are feeling a lack of mobile infrastructure for mobile data. The iPhone entered the market and drastically changed the playing field. This device changed the way users explore the internet by encouraging mobile applications for different online activities. The increase in the phone’s popularity coupled with the explosion of applications for the iPhone has crippled the AT&T infrastructure in cities that have a predominant mass using this device.
And this is just going to get worse. According to the latest Mary Meeker report 2009 is the year of mobile internet growth and it is just going to continue to expand.
New phones are entering the market that are built to be mini-computers. Every major carrier in the States is going to have to deal with the infrastructure issue and fast. Users are unable to cope with the lack of connectivity. Infrastructure for data and connectivity is going to cost money .
John Stratton, Verizon Wireless’s marketing chief was quoted in a recently WSJ article titled “The Coming Mobile Meltdown” saying he “recently assured an interviewer that the mobile net would be open to all kinds of devices and uses. But he also predicted “a higher emphasis on usage-based billing, where if you consume more of the network, you pay more.”
I predict that if the mobile infrastructure does not grow fast enough for consumers, innovators are going to create a solution cutting out the mobile carriers altogether. And then where will they be? Extinct.
(Image Courtesy of Zinkwazi )
Creativity will keep your company alive. Just remember you could end up inside the chalk if you hate ideas and creativity.
(Flickr Image by Kate_A)